North Carolina Rheumatology Association North Carolina Rheumatology Association
Annual Meeting | Announcements | Links
 
Home
Position Statements
Announcements
Links
Executive Board
Member Directory
Clinical Trials
Job Openings
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Portable MRI for in-office use can be an invaluable tool to the diagnosis and management of patients with inflammatory arthropathies and should therefore be readily available as an important diagnostic modality.

Background

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has been shown to be superior to conventional radiography for detection of marginal erosions in inflammatory arthropathies and can be a diagnostic tool to predict subsequent radiographic damage.1-3 Early detection and staging of rheumatoid arthritis appears to have significant prognostic implications on disease progression4-5 and can more accurately help guide therapy in the individual patient. Until recently, the routine use of MRI in evaluating inflammatory arthropathies has been limited by the relative high cost, the difficulty in positioning disabled patients and the inability to image several joints simultaneously. However, there are now available lower-cost, portable, in-office MRI units which can be used without special room preparation and shielding. These smaller unit scan protocols are tailored for optimal visualization of erosions in the hands, wrist, and feet. We believe this technology is an important advance in the evaluation and treatment of patients with arthritis and offer these additional facts as support.

1) A peripheral MRI is small and can be incorporated into a specialty office practice in a comfortable and convenient setting for patients.
2) Compared with traditional MRI technology this is relatively inexpensive.
3) Portable low field MRI systems image small areas in a nonuniform magnetic field, which contributes to lower installation and operational costs than standard MRI which are built around a uniform magnetic field.
3) The images are created at a much higher spatial resolution than traditional machines allowing more detail of erosions, which are critical to guiding rheumatology decision making. The cuts are 1x1x1 millimeter as opposed to standard MRI, 3 mm cuts with 0.5mm spaces between cuts. Since bony erosions are often 2 to 3 mm the standard machines can miss entire erosions.
4) Traditional MRI machines require patients to lie immobile with their arms extended above their heads to image the hands or wrists and this is difficult or impossible for many patients with disabling arthritis. Portable low field units allow patients to sit or lay back in a standard reclining chair and place the hand or foot into the open machine for imaging.
5) Early disease detection and proper identification of early structural changes in arthritis patients with aggressive disease can help guide therapeutic interventions and improve outcomes.

Bibliography
1. Crus J, Shellock F, Dardashti s, et al. Identification of wrist and MCP joint erosions using a portable-MR system compared to conventional x-ray. J Rheumatol 2004;31:676-85.
2. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Sandrock D, et al. Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis 2002;61:895-904.
3. McQueen F, Benton N, Perry D, et al. Bone edema scored on magnetic resonance imaging scans of the dominant carpus at presentation predicts radiographic joint damage of the hands and feet six years later in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism 2003;48(7):1814-1827.
4. Emery P. Evidence supporting the benefit of early intervention in rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Rheumatol 2002;29:3-8.
5. Irvine S, Munro R, Porter D. Early referral, diagnosis, and treatment of rheumatoid: evidence for changing medical practice. Ann Rheum Dis 1999;58:510-513.

 

Site designed, hosted and maintained by Atlantic BT                                                         © 2010 North Carolina Rheumatology Association. All rights reserved.